Timber Material vs. Steel and Concrete: A Practical Comparison

A side-by-side look at timber, steel, and concrete — covering embodied carbon, speed of construction, cost, and where each wins

If you're choosing structural and enclosure materials for a project, the timber material vs. steel/concrete question comes up early. Each has strengths — the key is matching material to project priorities, not finding a single "best" material.

We manufacture modified timber products used in hybrid structures and low-rise timber-framed buildings. Here's an honest side-by-side comparison to help you specify.

Embodied Carbon: Where the Biggest Difference Is

Material Embodied Carbon (kg CO₂e/kg) Biogenic Carbon
Structural steel (primary) 1.8–2.8 None
Concrete (structural) 0.10–0.18 None
Saown softwood timber −0.5 to −1.2 (biogenic) Stored in wood

Keep in mind: Timber's carbon advantage is largest in the structure itself. For a typical mid-rise building, replacing a concrete frame with timber can reduce embodied carbon by 20–40% on the structural scope.

Construction Speed and Site Logistics

  • Timber (prefab): Wall panels and floor cassettes arrive factory-made. Crane lifts them into place. A 3-storey timber-framed building can be enclosed in days, not weeks.
  • Concrete: Requires formwork, rebar, pouring, and curing. Each step adds days on-site. But concrete can be poured in weather that timber cladding crews would shut down for.
  • Steel: Bolting steel members is fast — but steel itself needs protective coating, fire protection, and oftenConcrete foundations. Hybrid steel-timber systems are increasingly common.

Where Timber Wins — and Where It Doesn't

Material Suitability by Application

  • Low-rise structures (1–5 storeys): Timber wins on speed, carbon, and cost. Prefab timber panels are the standard in many European residential developments.
  • High-rise (6+ storeys): Concrete and steel dominate. Cross-laminated timber (CLT) is pushing the boundary, but fire regulation is stricter above certain heights.
  • Facades and cladding: Timber cladding with modified timber (Class B-s1,d0) performs well. Concrete panels are heavier and more expensive to install on timber-framed buildings.

Our outdoor flame-retardant wall panels are specified in hybrid timber-concrete buildings where the facade needs timber aesthetics with fire compliance.

Specifying Timber in a Hybrid or All-Timber Build?

We provide modified timber products for structural and cladding use — with fire, durability, and carbon documentation to support your material comparison.

Or contact our technical team to discuss material selection for your project.

Get In Touch

Don't hesitate to contact with us

Sending your message. Please wait...